Cover of book: Don't Steal My Steel
Your institution does not yet own a licence for this publication. You can .
Book Titles No access

Don't Steal My Steel

How Interest Group Systems Impact Iron and Steel Policies
Authors:
Publisher:
 2016

Summary

Machen es bestimmte Konfigurationen von Interessengruppensystemen einfacher für Lobbies, Erfolg zu haben? Dieses Buch beantwortet diese Frage, indem es die Beziehungen zwischen Interessengruppen analysiert und kommt zu dem Schluss, dass sich in institutionellen Systemen, in denen hauptsächlich Kooperation von Interessengruppen oder Wettbewerb von Interessengruppen vorherrschen, die Erfolgschancen für eine Spezialinteressenpolitik verringern. Methodisch stützt sich dieser Schluss auf qualitative und quantitative Methoden, wie Fallstudien, eine fsQCA und eine Panel-Analyse. Das Buch leistet einen Beitrag zur Literatur um Interessengruppen, aber auch zur Vergleichenden Politikwissenschaft und zur Politischen Ökonomie. Außerdem ist es interessant für alle, die sich für die Politische Ökonomie von Rohstoffpolitik interessieren.



Bibliographic data

Copyright year
2016
ISBN-Print
978-3-8487-2942-5
ISBN-Online
978-3-8452-7336-5
Publisher
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Series
Vergleichende Analyse politischer Systeme
Volume
8
Language
English
Pages
268
Product type
Book Titles

Table of contents

ChapterPages
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis No access Pages 1 - 22
      1. Defining interest groups No access
      2. Interest group systems No access
    1. Interest group systems and the process of policy making No access
    2. Expected variance in iron and steel interests across countries No access
    3. Research design and findings No access
    4. Contributions of the analysis No access
    5. Plan of the book No access
      1. From resources policies in general to economic p No access
      2. From economic policies to the focus on iron and steel policies No access
      3. Who is behind iron and steel? No access
      1. Policies that contain benefits for firms No access
      2. Characteristics of special interest policies No access
      3. A special interest policy for the iron and steel industry No access
      4. Special interest policy disaggregation into policy instruments No access
      5. Policy outputs and outcomes No access
      1. Policies create winners and losers – two assumptions No access
      2. Influencing policymakers under perfect and imperfectinformation No access
      3. Information improving mechanisms: interest group coordinationand competition No access
        1. Comparative implications: Four empirical states of the world No access
        2. Empirical implications for a competitive interest group system No access
        3. Empirical implications for a coordinated interest group system No access
      4. Observable special interest policies- always the productof lobbying? No access
      5. Special interest policies and structural business power No access
      6. Access points, niches and salience No access
    1. Summary and theoretical expectations No access
      1. The cases for the analysis of iron and steel policies No access
      2. The subset of cases for the extension of the analysis No access
    1. Period of observation - the price boom and beyond No access
    2. Testing the empirical implications – the empirical strategy No access
    3. FsQCA, case studies and panel regression No access
    4. Summary No access
    1. Translating the argument and theoretical expectationsinto „fsQCA” No access
      1. Method and period of observation No access
      2. Calibration of the conditions No access
      3. The outcome set: special interest steel policies No access
        1. Interest group coordination No access
        2. Interest group competition No access
      4. Competitiveness of the country No access
      5. Specialization on the iron and steel industries No access
    2. Fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis – method and data No access
      1. Necessary conditions for (no) special interest steel policies No access
      2. Sufficient conditions for the outcome „Special intereststeel policies” No access
      3. Sufficient conditions for the outcome „No special intereststeel policy” No access
      4. Discussion No access
    1. Characteristics of a coordinated interest group system No access
      1. Puzzling cases and comparisons No access
        1. The most deviant case- Germany No access
        2. The most similar case to Germany- Belgium No access
      2. Data collection for the cases No access
      3. Interviews and data collection process No access
      1. Classifying Belgian iron and steel policies No access
        1. Policies concerning resource efficiency No access
        2. Policies for securing supply No access
      2. Interest group systems on the federal and regional level No access
        1. Step 1: Policy demands and encompassingness of the umbrellaorganizations No access
        2. Step 2: Truthfulness No access
        3. Step 3: Policy Choice No access
      3. Resource supply – not an issue for the Belgian policymakers? No access
      4. Alternative explanations for the absence of a special iron andsteel policy No access
      5. Discussion No access
      1. The German Raw Materials Strategy as a special intereststeel policy No access
      2. Summing up the policy goals No access
      3. The German system of interest group coordination No access
      4. Interest groups at work- a timeline for the German RawMaterials Strategy No access
        1. Step 1: Encompassingness of the umbrella organization No access
        2. Step 2 – Truthfulness: Analyzing the content of the RawMaterials Strategy No access
        3. Step 2 - Truthfulness: Alternative policy preferences andrelation to other interest groups No access
        4. Step 3: Policy Choices – institutional entrenchment andpull factors from policymakers No access
      5. Alternative explanations for the German Raw Material Strategy No access
      6. Discussion No access
    2. Comparing Belgium and Germany No access
    1. The variety of state aid in the European Union No access
    2. Interest group systems and state aid - the argument applied No access
        1. Data on state aid No access
        2. Data on interest groups No access
        3. Control variables No access
      1. Method No access
    3. The impact of interest group systems on state aid No access
    4. Discussion No access
    1. The argument No access
    2. Research strategy and findings No access
    3. Implications for political science research No access
    4. Policy implications No access
    5. If you are not at the table you are on the menu36 No access
  2. References No access Pages 231 - 253
    1. Appendix A: Analysis of news articles in FAKTIVA No access
    2. Appendix B: Interview Guideline No access
    3. Appendix C: fsQCA Tables No access
    4. Appendix D: Membership in employers’ organizations inBelgium No access
    5. Appendix E: List of interviewees for the case studies No access

Bibliography (420 entries)

  1. References Open Google Scholar
  2. Ainsworth, S. 1993. Regulating Lobbyists and Interest Group Influence. Journal Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/2132227
  3. of Politics. vol. 55. no. 1. pp. 41-56. Open Google Scholar
  4. Ainsworth, S. 2010. Methodological Perspectives on Interest Groups. In: Maisel, L. S. & Berry, J. M. (eds.) The Oxford handbook of American political parties and interest groups. Oxford University Press. Oxford. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199542628.001.0001
  5. Amm, J. 2007. Umweltverbände. In: von Winter, T. & Willems, U. (eds.) Interessenverbände in Deutschland. Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Wiesbaden. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-90602-7_14
  6. Andersen, U. & Woyke, W. 2013. Handwörterbuch des politischen Systems der Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-19072-3
  7. Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Springer. Berlin. Open Google Scholar
  8. Anderson, C. J. 2000. Economic voting and political context: a comparative perspective. Electoral Studies. vol. 19. no. 2-3. pp. 151-170. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1016/S0261-3794(99)00045-1
  9. Angerer, G., Erdmann, L., Marscheider-Weidemann, F., Scharp, M., Lüllmann, A., Handke, V. & Marwede, M. 2009. Rohstoffe für Zukunftstechnologien. Fraunhofer IRB. Stuttgart. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511635359.014
  10. Armingeon, K., Knöpfel, L., Weisstanner, D. & Engler, S. 2015. Comparative Political Dataset I, 1960-2012. Available: Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0032-3470-2015-3-506
  11. http://www.ipw.unibe.ch/unibe/wiso/ipw/content/e2425/e2426/e3672/e5113/files559915/CPDSI1960-2012stata_ger.dta [Accessed 01.01.2015]. Open Google Scholar
  12. Austen-Smith, D. & Wright, J. R. 1992. Competitive Lobbying for a legislator's vote. Social Choice and Welfare. vol. 9. no. 3. pp. 229-257. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/BF00192880
  13. Austen-Smith, D. & Wright, J. R. 1994. Counteractive Lobbying. American Journal of Political Science. vol. 38. no. 1. pp. 25-44. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/2111334
  14. Australian Associated Press General News. 2011. FED:Steel support package passes Senate. Australian Associated Press General News. 09/11/2011. Open Google Scholar
  15. Axelrod, R. 1984. The evolution of cooperation. Basic Books. New York. Open Google Scholar
  16. Baccaro, L. 2003. What is alive and what is dead in the theory of corporatism. British Journal of Industrial Relations. vol. 41. no. 4. pp. 683-706. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1046/j.1467-8543.2003.00294.x
  17. Baldwin, R. E. & Robert-Nicoud, F. 2009. Industrial policy: why governments pick losers. London School of Economics and Social Sciences. London. Open Google Scholar
  18. Bardt, H., Kempermann, H. & Lichtblau, K. 2013. Rohstoffe für die Industrie. Institut der deutschen Wirtschaft. Köln. Open Google Scholar
  19. Basedau, M. & Lay, J. 2009. Resource Curse or Rentier Peace? The Ambiguous Effects of Oil Wealth and Oil Dependence on Violent Conflict. Journal of Peace Research. vol. 46. no. 6. pp. 757-776. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/0022343309340500
  20. Baumgartner, F. R. & Jones, B. D. 1993. Agendas and instability in American politics. University of Chicago Press. Chicago. Open Google Scholar
  21. Baumgartner, F. R. & Leech, B. L. 1998. Basic Interests - The Importance of Groups in Politics and in Political Science. Princeton University Press. New Jersey. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1515/9781400822485
  22. Baumgartner, F. R. & Leech, B. L. 2001. Interest niches and policy bandwagons: Patterns of interest group involvement in national politics. Journal of Politics. vol. 63. no. 4. pp. 1191-1213. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/0022-3816.00106
  23. Baumol, W. J. 1982. Contestable Markets - an Uprising in the Theory of Industry Structure. American Economic Review. vol. 72. no. 1. pp. 1-15. Open Google Scholar
  24. Bazant, U. & Schuber, K. 2007. Verbände in Politiknetzwerken. In: von Winter, T. & Willems, U. (eds.) Interessenverbände in Deutschland. Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Wiesbaden. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-90602-7_16
  25. BDA 2002. Satzung der Bundesvereinigung der Deutschen Arbeitgeberverbände. Bundesverband der Deutschen Arbeitgeberverbände. Berlin. Open Google Scholar
  26. BDI 2001. Satzung des Bundesverbandes der Deutschen Industrie e.V. Bundesverband der Deutschen Industrie. Berlin. Open Google Scholar
  27. BDI 2005. Rohstoffsicherheit- Herausforderungen für die Industrie. Bundesverband der Deutschen Industrie. Berlin. Open Google Scholar
  28. BDI 2006. Rohstoffsicherheit - Anfoderungen an Industrie und Politik: Ergebnisbericht der BDI- Präsidialgruppe "Internationale Rohstofffragen". Bundesverband der Deutschen Industrie. Berlin. Open Google Scholar
  29. BDI 2008. Rohstoffsicherheit für Deutschland und Europa. Bundesverband der Deutschen Industrie. Berlin. Open Google Scholar
  30. Beck, T., Clarke, G., Groff, A., Keefer, P. & Walsh, P. 2001. New tools in comparative political economy: The database of political institutions. World Bank Economic Review. vol. 15. no. 1. pp. 165-176. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/wber/15.1.165
  31. Becker, G. S. 1983. A Theory of Competition Among Pressure Groups for Political Influence. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. vol. 98. no. 3. pp. 371-400. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/1886017
  32. Behrens, M. 2010. Strukturen der Interessenvertretung in den Verbänden der Wirtschaft. In: Schroeder, W. & Weßels, B. (eds.) Handbuch Arbeitgeber- und Wirtschaftsverbände in Deutschland ein Handbuch. Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Wiesbaden. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-92452-6_8
  33. Bell, A. & Jones, K. 2014. Explaining Fixed Effects: Random Effects Modeling of Time-Series Cross-Sectional and Panel Data. Political Science Research and Methods. vol. 3. no. 1. pp. 133-153. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2014.7
  34. Bell, S. 2012. The Power of Ideas: The Ideational Shaping of the Structural Power of Business. International Studies Quarterly. vol. 56. no. 4. pp. 661-673. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2478.2012.00743.x
  35. Bell, S. & Hindmoor, A. 2009. Rethinking governance the centrality of the state in modern society. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511814617.001
  36. Bell, S. & Hindmoor, A. 2013. The Structural Power of Business and the Power of Ideas: The Strange Case of the Australian Mining Tax. New Political Economy. vol. 19. no. 3. pp. 470-486. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2013.796452
  37. Bemelmans-Videc, M.-L., Rist, R. C. & Vedung, E. 1998. Carrots, sticks & sermons : policy instruments and their evaluation. Transaction Publishers. New Brunswick. Open Google Scholar
  38. Bernardini, O. & Galli, R. 1993. Dematerialization: Long-term trends in the intensity of use of materials and energy. Futures. vol. 25. no. 4. pp. 431-448. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1016/0016-3287(93)90005-E
  39. Bernhagen, P. & Bräuninger, T. 2005. Structural Power and Public Policy: A Signaling Model of Business Lobbying in Democratic Capitalism. Political Studies. vol. 53. no. 1. pp. 43-64. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2005.00516.x
  40. Bernheim, B. D. & Winston, M. D. 1986. Menu Auctions, Resource Allocation, and Economic Influence. Quarterly Journal of Economics. vol. 51. no. 1. pp. 1-31. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/1884639
  41. Besley, T. & Coate, S. 2001. Lobbying and welfare in a representative democracy. Review of Economic Studies. vol. 68. no. 1. pp. 67-82. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/1467-937X.00160
  42. Beverelli, C., Dell'Erba, S. & Rocha, N. 2011. Dutch Disease Revisited. Oil Discoveries and Movements of the Real Exchange Rate when Manufacturing is Resource-Intensive. International Economics and Economic Policy. vol. 8. no. 2. pp. 139-153. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/s10368-011-0190-3
  43. Beyers, J. 2002. Gaining and seeking access: The European adaptation of domestic interest associations. European Journal of Political Research. vol. 41. no. 5. pp. 585-612. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.00023
  44. Beyers, J. 2004. Voice and access - Political practices of European interest associations. European Union Politics. vol. 5. no. 2. pp. 211-240. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/1465116504042442
  45. Beyers, J., Eising, R. & Maloney, W. 2008. Researching Interest Group Politics in Europe and Elsewhere: Much We Study, Little We Know? West European Politics. vol. 31. no. 6. pp. 1103-1128. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/01402380802370443
  46. BGR 2005. Bundesrepublik Deutschland Rohstoffsituation 2004. Bundesanstalt für Geowissenschaften und Rohstoffe. Hannover. Open Google Scholar
  47. BGR 2007. Bundesrepublik Deutschland Rohstoffsituation 2006. Bundesanstalt für Geowissenschaften und Rohstoffe. Hannover. Open Google Scholar
  48. Binderkrantz, A. 2008. Different Groups, Different Strategies: How Interest Groups Pursue Their Political Ambitions. Scandinavian Political Studies. vol. 31. no. 2. pp. 173-200. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9477.2008.00201.x
  49. Blatter, J. & Haverland, M. 2012. Designing case studies explanatory approaches in small-N research. Palgrave Macmillan. Basingstoke. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1057/9781137016669_5
  50. Blauberger, M. 2009a. Compliance with rules of negative integration: European state aid control in the new member states. Journal of European Public Policy. vol. 16. no. 7. pp. 1030-1046. Open Google Scholar
  51. Blauberger, M. 2009b. Of 'Good' and 'Bad' Subsidies: European State Aid Control through Soft and Hard Law. West European Politics. vol. 32. no. 4. pp. 719-737. Open Google Scholar
  52. Bleischwitz, R. 2009. Globale Rohstoffpolitik. Nomos. Baden-Baden. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845218922
  53. Bleischwitz, R. 2010. International Economics of Resource Productivity - Relevance, Measurement, Empirical Trend, Innovation, Resource Policy. International Economics and Economic Policy. vol. 7. no. 2-3. pp. 227-244. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/s10368-010-0170-z
  54. Bleischwitz, R. & Bringezu, S. 2008. Global Governance for Sustainable Resource Management. Minerals and Energy - Raw Materials Report. vol. 23. no. 2. pp. 84-101. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/14041040802247278
  55. Blum, S. & Schubert, K. 2011. Politikfeldanalyse. Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Wiesbaden. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-92097-9_2
  56. BMU 2012. Deutsches Ressourceneffizienzprogramm (ProgRess). Bundesumweltministerium. Berlin. Open Google Scholar
  57. BMWFJ 2010. Österreichisches Montanhandbuch 2010 - Bergbau, Rohstoffe, Grundstoffe, Energie. Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft Familie und Jugend. Wien. Open Google Scholar
  58. BMWFJ. 2011. Österreichisches Montanhandbuch 2010. Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft Familie und Jugend. Vienna. Available: Open Google Scholar
  59. https://www.bmwfw.gv.at/EnergieUndBergbau/Montanhandbuch/Documents/MHB%202010.pdf [Accessed 09/04/2015]. Open Google Scholar
  60. BMWI 2007. Elemente einer Rohstoffstrategie der Bundesregierung. Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Technologie. Berlin. Open Google Scholar
  61. BMWI 2008. Zwischenbilanz der Rohstoffaktivitäten der Bundesregierung. Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Technologie. Berlin. Open Google Scholar
  62. BMWI 2010. Rohstoffstrategie der Bundesregierung. Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Technologie. Berlin. Open Google Scholar
  63. BMZ 2010. Entwicklungspolitisches Strategiepapier- Extraktive Rohstoffe. Bundesministerium für wirtschaftliche Zusammenarbeit und Entwicklung. Berlin. Open Google Scholar
  64. Borzel, T. A. 1998. Organizing Babylon - On the different conceptions of policy networks. Public Administration. vol. 76. no. 2. pp. 253-273. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/1467-9299.00100
  65. Bouwen, P. 2001. Corporate lobbying in the European Union : towards a theory of access. European University Institute, Department of Political and Social Sciences. San Domenico. Open Google Scholar
  66. Bouwen, P. 2002. Corporate lobbying in the European Union: the logic of access. Journal of European Public Policy. vol. 9. no. 3. pp. 365-390. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/13501760210138796
  67. Bouwen, P. & McCown, M. 2007. Lobbying versus litigation: political and legal strategies of interest representation in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy. vol. 14. no. 3. pp. 422-443. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/13501760701243798
  68. Brady, H. E. 2010. Rethinking social inquiry diverse tools, shared standards. Rowman & Littlefield. Lanham. Open Google Scholar
  69. Brady, H. E., Collier, D. & Seawright, J. 2006. Toward a pluralistic vision of methodology. Political Analysis. vol. 14. no. 3. pp. 353-368. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpj021
  70. Braun, D. & Giraud, O. 2009. Politikinstrumente im Kontext von Staat, Markt und Governance. In: Schubert, K. & Bandelow, N. C. (eds.) Lehrbuch der Politikfeldanalyse 2.0. Oldenbourg. München. Open Google Scholar
  71. Brennan, G. & Buchanan, J. M. 1985. The reason of rules : constitutional political economy. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge. Open Google Scholar
  72. Brinkerhoff, D. & Goldsmith, A. 2002. Clientelism, Patrimonialism and Democratic Governance: An Overview and Framework for Assessment and Programming. Available: http://www.abtassociates.com/reports/2002601089183_30950.pdf [Accessed 13/03/2015]. Open Google Scholar
  73. Broscheid, A. & Coen, D. 2007. Lobbying activity and fora creation in the EU: empirically exploring the nature of the policy good. Journal of European Public Policy. vol. 14. no. 3. pp. 346-365. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/13501760701243749
  74. Buchanan, J. M., Tollison, R. D. & Tullock, G. 1980. Toward a theory of the rent-seeking society. Texas A & M University. College Station. Open Google Scholar
  75. Bührer, W. 2010. Geschichte und Funktion der deutschen Wirtschaftsverbände. In: Schroeder, W. & Weßels, B. (eds.) Handbuch Arbeitgeber- und Wirtschaftsverbände in Deutschland. Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Wiesbaden. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-92452-6_3
  76. Buigues, P.-A. & Sekkat, K. 2009. Industrial policy in Europe, Japan and the USA : amounts, mechanisms and effectiveness. Palgrave Macmillan. Houndmills. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1057/9780230244351_5
  77. Burstein, P. & Linton, A. 2002. The impact of political parties, interest groups, and social movement organizations on public policy: Some recent evidence and theoretical concerns. Social Forces. vol. 81. no. 2. pp. 381-408. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1353/sof.2003.0004
  78. Callander, S. 2011. Searching for Good Policies. American Political Science Review. vol. 105. no. 4. pp. 643-662. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/S0003055411000426
  79. Campante, F. R. & Ferreira, F. H. G. 2007. Inefficient lobbying, populism and oligarchy. Journal of Public Economics. vol. 91. no. 5-6. pp. 993-1021. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2006.12.006
  80. Canas, A., Ferrao, P. & Conceicao, P. 2003. A new environmental Kuznets curve? Relationship between direct material input and income per capita: evidence from industrialised countries. Ecological Economics. vol. 46. no. 2. pp. 217-229. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(03)00123-X
  81. Caves, R. 1987. Industrial Policy and Trade Policy: The connections. In: Kierzkowski, H. & Corden, W. M. (eds.) Protection and competition in international trade : essays in honor of W.M. Corden. Blackwell. Oxford Open Google Scholar
  82. CCE 2015. Composition of the Central Economic Council. Conseil Central del'économie. Brussels. Available: http://www.ccecrb.fgov.be/txt/fr/presentation3fr.pdf Open Google Scholar
  83. [Accessed 25/01/2015]. Open Google Scholar
  84. CCE. 2015. Membres du Conseil Central de l'Economie. Conseil Central del'économie. Brussels. Available: http://www.ccecrb.fgov.be/txt/fr/presentation3fr.pdf Open Google Scholar
  85. [Accessed 03/01/2015]. Open Google Scholar
  86. Chambre de représentants de Belgique 2011. Déclaration du Gouvernement Fédéral. Brussels. Open Google Scholar
  87. Chari, R. S., Hogan, J. & Murphy, G. 2010. Regulating lobbying : a global comparison. Manchester University Press. Manchester. Open Google Scholar
  88. Chenery, H., Robinson, S. & Syrquin, M. 1986. Industrialization and Growth. World Bank. Washington. Open Google Scholar
  89. Cheon, A. & Urpelainen, J. 2013. How do Competing Interest Groups Influence Environmental Policy? The Case of Renewable Electricity in Industrialized Democracies, 1989–2007. Political Studies. vol. 61. no. 4. pp. 874-897. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12006
  90. Coates, D., Heckelman, J. & Wilson, B. 2007. Determinants of interest group formation. Public Choice. vol. 133. no. 3. pp. 377-391. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/s11127-007-9195-4
  91. Coates, D., Heckelman, J. & Wilson, B. 2011. Special-interest groups and growth. Public Choice. vol. 147. no. 3-4. pp. 439-457. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/s11127-010-9640-7
  92. Coates, D., Heckelman, J. C. & Wilson, B. 2010. The Political Economy of Investment: Sclerotic Effects from Interest Groups. European Journal of Political Economy. vol. 26. no. 2. pp. 208-221. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2009.12.003
  93. Cobb, R., Ross, J. K. & Ross, M. H. 1976. Agenda Building as a Comparative Political Process. American Political Science Review. vol. 70. no. 1. pp. 126-138. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/1960328
  94. Coen, D. 2007. Empirical and theoretical studies in EU lobbying. Journal of European Public Policy. vol. 14. no. 3. pp. 333-345. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/13501760701243731
  95. Cohen, B. J. 2009. Striking a nerve. Review of International Political Economy. vol. 16. no. 1. pp. 136 - 143. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/09692290802524166
  96. Coleman, J. S. 1990. Foundations of social theory. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. Cambridge. Open Google Scholar
  97. Collier, D. 2014. Comment: QCA Should Set Aside the Algorithms. Sociological Methodology. vol. 44. no. 1. pp. 122-126. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/0081175014542568
  98. Collier, D., Brady, H. E. & Seawright, J. 2010. Outdated Views of Qualitative Methods: Time to Move On. Political Analysis. vol. 18. no. 4. pp. 506-513. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpq022
  99. Collier, P. & Hoeffler, A. 2004. Greed and Grievance in Civil War. Oxford Economic Papers. vol. 56. no. 4. pp. 563-595. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/oep/gpf064
  100. Commission interdépartementale pour le développement durable 2009. Avant-Project de Plan Fédéral de Développement durable 2009 - 2012. Commission interdépartementale pour le Développement durable. Brussels. Open Google Scholar
  101. Conseil des Ministres de Belgique 2004. Plan fédéral de developpement durable 2004-2008. Conseil de Ministres de Belgique. Brussels. Open Google Scholar
  102. Crepaz, M. M. L. 1992. Corporatism in Decline - an Empirical-Analysis of the Impact of Corporatism on Macroeconomic Performance and Industrial Disputes in 18 Industrialized Democracies. Comparative Political Studies. vol. 25. no. 2. pp. 139-168. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/0010414092025002001
  103. Crepaz, M. M. L. 1995. Explaining national variations of air pollution levels: Political institutions and their impact on environmental policy‐making. Environmental Politics. vol. 4. no. 3. pp. 391-414. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/09644019508414213
  104. CRISP 1998. Conseil Central de l'Économie - Un démi-siècle. CRISP. Brussels. Open Google Scholar
  105. Crouch, C. 1983. Pluralism and the New Corporatism - a Rejoinder. Political Studies. vol. 31. no. 3. pp. 452-460. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1983.tb01774.x
  106. Culpepper, P. D. 2011. Quiet politics and business power corporate control in Europe and Japan. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge. Open Google Scholar
  107. Cusack, T. R. 1999. Partisan politics and fiscal policy. Comparative Political Studies. vol. 32. no. 4. pp. 464-486. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/0010414099032004003
  108. Dahl, R. A. 2005. Who Governs?: Democracy and Power in an American City. Yale University Press. Yale. Open Google Scholar
  109. Dahlmann, A. & Mildner, S.-A. 2013. Deutschlands Rohstoffpartnerschaften- Modell mit Vorbildcharakter? Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung. Berlin. Open Google Scholar
  110. Dal Bó, E. 2006. Regulatory Capture: A Review. Oxford Review of Economic Policy. vol. 22. no. 2. pp. 203-225. Open Google Scholar
  111. Dannreuther, R. & Ostrowski, W. 2013. Global resources : conflict and cooperation. Palgrave Macmillan. Houndmills. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1057/9781137349149_1
  112. de Figueiredo, J. M. & Richter, B. K. 2014. Advancing the Empirical Research on Lobbying. Annual Review of Political Science. vol. 17. no. 1. pp. 163-185. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-100711-135308
  113. De Grauwe, P. & Polan, M. 2005. Globalization and Social Spending. Pacific Economic Review. vol. 10. no. 1. pp. 105-123. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0106.2005.00263.x
  114. De Winter, L., Swyngedouw, M. & Dumont, P. 2006. Party system(s) and electoral behaviour in Belgium: From stability to balkanisation. West European Politics. vol. 29. no. 5. pp. 933-956. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/01402380600968836
  115. Department of Environement Food and Rural Affairs 2012. A Review of National Resource Strategies and Research. London. Open Google Scholar
  116. Deschouwer, K. 2006. And the peace goes on? Consociational democracy and Belgian politics in the twenty-first century. West European Politics. vol. 29. no. 5. pp. 895-911. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/01402380600968760
  117. Deschouwer, K. 2012. The politics of Belgium. Palgrave Macmillan. Houndmills. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-03025-2_9
  118. Destatis 2014. Erwerbstätigkeit der Bevölkerung - Ausgewählte Tabellen des Zensus mit Stichtag 9. Mai 2011. Statistisches Bundesamt. Wiesbaden. Open Google Scholar
  119. Deutscher Bundestag 2012. Gesetz zur Förderung der Kreislaufwirtschaft und Sicherung der umweltverträglichen Bewirtschaftung von Abfällen (Kreislaufwirtschaftsgesetz - KrWG). Deutscher Bundestag. Berlin. Open Google Scholar
  120. DIHK 2011. Satzung des deutschen Industrie- und Handelskammertages. DIHK. Berlin. Open Google Scholar
  121. DIW 2004. Starke Nachfrage nach elektronischen Konsum- und Industriegütern lässt Weltmärkte der Elektronikmetalle expandieren. DIW. Berlin. Open Google Scholar
  122. Dixit, A., Grossman, G. M. & Helpman, E. 1997. Common agency and coordination: General theory and application to government policy making. Journal of Political Economy. vol. 105. no. 4. pp. 752-769. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1086/262092
  123. Doner, R. F. & Schneider, B. R. 2000. Business Associations and Economic Development: Why Some Associations Contribute More Than Others. Business and Politics. vol. 2. no. 3. pp. 261-288. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2202/1469-3569.1011
  124. Dose, N. 2008. Wiederbelebung der Policyforschung durch konzeptionelle Erneuerung. In: Janning, F. & Toens, K. (eds.) Die Zukunft der Policy-Forschung: Theorien, Methoden, Anwendungen. Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Wiesbaden. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-90774-1_10
  125. Dow Jones. 2015. FAKTIVA Database. Available: Open Google Scholar
  126. https://global.factiva.com/np/default.aspx?NAPC=P&inpt=Factiva [Accessed 02/02/2015]. Open Google Scholar
  127. Dudley, G. & Richardson, J. 1999. Competing advocacy coalitions and the process of 'frame reflection': a longitudinal analysis of EU steel policy. Journal of European Public Policy. vol. 6. no. 2. pp. 225-248. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/135017699343694
  128. Dur, A. 2008. Interest Groups in the European Union: How Powerful Are They? West European Politics. vol. 31. no. 6. pp. 1212-1230. Open Google Scholar
  129. Dür, A. 2008. Measuring Interest Group Influence in the EU: A Note on Methodology. European Union Politics. vol. 9. no. 4. pp. 559-576. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/01402380802372662
  130. Dür, A. & Mateo, G. 2014. The Europeanization of interest groups: Group type, resources and policy area. European Union Politics. vol. 15. no. 4. pp. 572-594. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2014.900893
  131. Duşa, A. 2007. Enhancing Quine-McCluskey. Compasss Working Paper Series. Compasss. Open Google Scholar
  132. EEA 2011. 2011 Survey of Resource Efficiency polices in EEA member and cooperationg countries- Country Profile: Belgium. European Environmental Agency. Brussels. Open Google Scholar
  133. Ehrlich, S. D. 2007. Access to Protection: Domestic Institutions and Trade Policy in Democracies. International Organization. vol. 61. no. 3. pp. 571-605. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/S0020818307070191
  134. Eifert, M. 2008. Chinas Außenwirtschaftspolitik im Bereich der mineralischen Rohstoffbeschaffung-Theorie und Empirie unter dem Aspekt der Portfoliotheoretischen Risikominimierung. VDM Verlag Dr. Müller. Saarbrücken. Open Google Scholar
  135. Eisenmenger, N., Schaffartzik, A., Krausmann, F. & Milota, E. 2011. Ressourcennutzung in Österreich - Bericht 2011. Bundesministerium für Land- und Forstwirtschaft, Umwelt und Wasserwirtschaft. Wien. Open Google Scholar
  136. Eising, R. 2004. The access of interest groups to EU institutions. Politische Vierteljahresschrift. vol. 45. no. 4. pp. 494-518. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/s11615-004-0088-6
  137. Eising, R. 2008. Clientelism, Committees, Pluralism and Protests in the European Union: Matching Patterns? West European Politics. vol. 31. no. 6. pp. 1166-1187. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/01402380802372647
  138. Eurinox 2014. Was ist nichtrostender Stahl. Informationsstelle Edelstahl Rostfrei. Düsseldorf. Open Google Scholar
  139. European Commission 2008. The raw materials initiative - meeting our critical needs for growth and jobs in Europe. Brussels. Open Google Scholar
  140. European Commission. 2014. State Aid Scoreboard 2014. European Commission. Brussels. Available: http://ec.europa.eu/competition/state_aid/scoreboard/index_en.html [Accessed 08/02/2015]. Open Google Scholar
  141. European Commission. 2015a. EU28 State Aid Overview [Online]. Available: Open Google Scholar
  142. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/tgm_comp/table.do?tab=table&init=1&language=en&pcode=comp_ncr_xrl_01&plugin=1 [Accessed 09/04/2015]. Open Google Scholar
  143. European Commission. 2015b. State Aid Scoreboard [Online]. Available: Open Google Scholar
  144. http://ec.europa.eu/competition/state_aid/scoreboard/conceptual_remarks_en.html [Accessed 27/03/2015]. Open Google Scholar
  145. European Union 1999. Council Regulation No 659/1999 of 22 March 1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union of the EC Treaty. Brussel. Open Google Scholar
  146. European Union. 2012. Consolidated versions of the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. Official Journal of the European Union. Vol. C 326. Open Google Scholar
  147. EUROSTAT. 2015a. Development of State Aid in EU from 2000 to 2011. Available: Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1787/sits_vol_1-2010-en-fr
  148. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/eurostat/tgm_comp/table.do?tab=table&init=1&plugin=1&language=en&pcode=comp_ncr_xrl_01 [Accessed 09/02/2015]. Open Google Scholar
  149. EUROSTAT. 2015b. GDP Data. EUROSTAT. Available: Open Google Scholar
  150. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database?node_code=namq_gdp_c [Accessed 01/01/2015]. Open Google Scholar
  151. Fédération des Entreprises de Belgique. 2004. Modifications des Statuts. Moniteur Belge. Moniteur Belge 2005-01-07. Brussels. Open Google Scholar
  152. .Fédération des Entreprises de Belgique. 2014. Notre handicap salarial a atteint le point de non-retour: 16.5% [Online]. Available: Open Google Scholar
  153. http://vbo-feb.be/fr-be/Dossiers/Marche-du-travail--emploi-/Reset_-and-Go/Notre-handicap-salarial-a-atteint-le-point-de-non-retour--165/ [Accessed 25/01/2015]. Open Google Scholar
  154. Federation of Belgian Chambers of Commerce. 2015. Who we are. Available: Open Google Scholar
  155. http://www.belgianchambers.be/en/who-we-are_91.aspx [Accessed 25/01/2015]. Open Google Scholar
  156. Feldt, H. 2012. Die deutsche Rohstoffstrategie- eine Bestandsaufnahme. Heinrich Böll Stiftung. Berlin. Open Google Scholar
  157. Ferejohn, J. A. 1974. Pork barrel politics; rivers and harbors legislation, 1947-1968. Stanford University Press. Stanford. Open Google Scholar
  158. FINEXPO. 2015. FINEXPO. Available: Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.14423/01.smj.0000460434.74749.36
  159. http://diplomatie.belgium.be/en/policy/economic_diplomacy/finexpo/more_info/ [Accessed 23/03/2015]. Open Google Scholar
  160. Flick, U. 2007. Qualitative Sozialforschung eine Einführung. Rowohlt Taschenbuch Verlag. Reinbek bei Hamburg. Open Google Scholar
  161. Fontana, M.-C. 2014. Europeanization and the weakening of domestic policy concertation comparing policy sectors in Belgium and Switzerland. Nomos. Baden-Baden. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845248547
  162. Fraenkel, E. 1968. Deutschland und die westlichen Demokratien. Kohlhammer. Stuttgart. Open Google Scholar
  163. Franchino, F. & Mainenti, M. 2013. Electoral Institutions and Distributive Policies in Parliamentary Systems: An Application to State Aid Measures in EU Countries. West European Politics. vol. 36. no. 3. pp. 498-520. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2012.757081
  164. Freedom House. 2015. Freedom of the World: Individual Country Ratings and Status 1973-2015. Freedom House. Available: https://freedomhouse.org/report-types/freedom-world#.VQbaj-FNdaQ [Accessed 16/03/2015]. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1016/j.disamonth.2015.03.002
  165. Frieden, J. A. 1991. Invested Interests - the Politics of National Economic-Policies in a World of Global Finance. International Organization. vol. 45. no. 4. pp. 425-451. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300033178
  166. Frondel, M., Kambeck, R. & Schmidt, C. M. 2007. Hard coal subsidies: A never-ending story? Energy Policy. vol. 35. no. 7. pp. 3807-3814. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2007.01.019
  167. G8 2007. Summit Declaration. G8. Heiligendamm. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1215/10829636-2007-007
  168. Gandenberger, C., Glöser, S., Marscheider- Weidemann, F., Ostertag, K. & Walz, R. 2012. Die Versorgung der deutschen Wirtschaft mit Roh- und Werkstoffen für Hochtechnologien- Präzisierung und Weiterentwicklung der deutschen Rohstoffstrategie. Büro für Technikfolgenabschätzung beim deutschen Bundestag. Berlin. Open Google Scholar
  169. Gandenberger, C., Marscheider-Weidemann, F. & Tercero, L. 2010. Kritische Rohstoffe aus europäischer Sicht. Die Volkswirtschaft. vol. 11. pp. 12-15. Open Google Scholar
  170. Garrett, G. 1998. Partisan politics in the global economy. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511625633
  171. Geddes, B. 2003. Paradigms and sand castles : theory building and research design in comparative politics. University of Michigan Press. Ann Arbor. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.3998/mpub.11910
  172. George, A. L., Bennett, A. & George, A. L. 2005. Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. MIT. Cambridge, Mass. Open Google Scholar
  173. Gerhardt-Weiß, S. 2006. Eine Ressourcenstrategie für Deutschland - Anforderungen. Stiftung Kathy Beys. Available: Open Google Scholar
  174. https://www.aachener-stiftung.de/national/ressourcen/2006-tagung-ressourcenstrategie-im-bmu.html [Accessed 01/04/2015]. Open Google Scholar
  175. Gerring, J. 2001. Social science methodology a criterial framework. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815492
  176. Gerring, J. 2007. Case study research principles and practices. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge. Open Google Scholar
  177. Gerring, J. 2012. Social science methodology a unified framework. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge. Open Google Scholar
  178. Ghosh, A. & Chatterjee, A. 2010. Ironmaking and Steelmaking. PHI Learning Private Limited. New Dehli. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1179/030192310X12731438631967
  179. Giesselmann, M. & Windzio, M. 2012. Regressionsmodelle zur Analyse von Paneldaten. Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Wiesbaden. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-18695-5_8
  180. Global Policy Forum Europe, Misereor, Brot für die Welt, Diakonie, FIAN Deutschland, GegenStömung, GermanWatch, INFOE, Internationales Konversionszentrum Bonn, Philippinenbüro, PowerShift, Südwind & Urgewald 2010. Anforderungen an eine zukunftsfähige Rohstoffstrategie. Global Policy Forum Europe. Berlin. Open Google Scholar
  181. Goertz, G. 2003. Necessary conditions theory, methodology and applications. Rowman & Littlefield. Lanham. Open Google Scholar
  182. Goodhart, L. M. 2014. Electoral Institutions, Particularism, and the Skill-Bias of Trade Protection. APSA Annual Meeting. Washington. Open Google Scholar
  183. Gouvernement Fédéral de Belgique 2003. Accord de gouvernement fédéral du 10 Juillet 2003. Gouvernement Fédéral de Belgique. Brussels. Open Google Scholar
  184. Gouvernement Fédéral de Belgique. 2015. Press Releases of the Council of Ministers. Brussels. Available: Open Google Scholar
  185. http://www.presscenter.org/fr/home/pressreleases/cmr?setlang=1 [Accessed 02/01/2015]. Open Google Scholar
  186. Gouvernement Wallon 2004. Déclaration de Politique Régionale 2004-2009. Gouvernement Wallon. Namur. Open Google Scholar
  187. Gouvernement Wallon 2005a. Contrat d'Avenir pour les Wallonnes et Wallons. Gouvernement Wallon. Namur. Open Google Scholar
  188. Gouvernement Wallon 2005b. Les actions prioritaires pour l'Avenir wallon. Gouvernment Wallon. Namur. Open Google Scholar
  189. Gouvernement Wallon 2005c. Plan stratéqique transversal 2005. Gouvernement Wallon. Namur. Open Google Scholar
  190. Gouvernement Wallon 2008. Déclaration de Politique Régionale 2009-2014. Gouvernement Wallon. Namur. Open Google Scholar
  191. Gouvernement Wallon 2010. Plan Marshall 2.vert. Gouvernement Wallon. Namur. Open Google Scholar
  192. Government of Flanders 2011. White Paper - a new industrial policy for Flanders. Government of Flanders. Brussel. Open Google Scholar
  193. Gray, V. & Lowery, D. 1993. The Diversity of State Interest Group Systems. Political Research Quarterly. vol. 46. no. 1. pp. 81-97. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/106591299304600107
  194. Gray, V. & Lowery, D. 1995. The Demography of Interest Organization Communities. American Politics Research. vol. 23. no. 1. pp. 3-32. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/1532673X9502300101
  195. Groser, M., Sack, D. & Schroeder, W. 2010. Die Industrie- und Handelskammerns im politischen System Deutschlands. In: Schroeder, W. & Weßels, B. (eds.) Handbuch Arbeitgeber- und Wirtschaftsverbände in Deutschland. Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Wiesbaden. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-92452-6_4
  196. Grossman, G. M. & Helpman, E. 1994. Protection for Sale. American Economic Review. vol. 84. no. 4. pp. 833-850. Open Google Scholar
  197. Grossman, G. M. & Helpman, E. 2001. Special interest politics. MIT Press. Cambridge. Open Google Scholar
  198. Groupement de la Sidérurgie. 2005. Rapport annuel du Groupement de la Sidérurgie. Brussels. Available: http://www.steelbel.be/images/2005FR.pdf [Accessed 24/01/2015]. Open Google Scholar
  199. Groupement de la Sidérurgie. 2006. Rapport annuel du Groupement de la Sidérurgie. Brussels. Available: http://www.steelbel.be/images/2006FR.pdf [Accessed 24/01/2015]. Open Google Scholar
  200. Groupement de la Sidérurgie. 2007. Rapport annuel du Groupement de la Sidérurgie. Brussels. Available: http://www.steelbel.be/images/2007FR.pdf [Accessed 24/01/2015]. Open Google Scholar
  201. Groupement de la Sidérurgie. 2008. Rapport annuel du Groupement de la Sidérurgie. Brussels. Available: http://www.steelbel.be/images/2008FR.pdf [Accessed 24/01/2015]. Open Google Scholar
  202. Groupement de la Sidérurgie. 2009. Rapport annuel du Groupement de la Sidérurgie. Brussels. Available: http://www.steelbel.be/images/2009FR.pdf [Accessed 24/01/2015]. Open Google Scholar
  203. Groupement de la Sidérurgie. 2010. Rapport annuel du Groupement de la Sidérurgie. Brussels. Available: http://www.steelbel.be/images/2010FR.pdf [Accessed 24/01/2015]. Open Google Scholar
  204. Groupement de la Sidérurgie. 2011. Rapport annuel du Groupement de la Sidérurgie. Brussels. Available: http://www.steelbel.be/images/2011FR.pdf [Accessed 24/01/2015]. Open Google Scholar
  205. Groupement de la Sidérurgie. 2012. Rapport annuel du Groupement de la Sidérurgie. Brussels. Available: http://www.steelbel.be/images/2012FR.pdf [Accessed 24/01/2015]. Open Google Scholar
  206. Gullberg, A. T. 2008. Lobbying friends and foes in climate policy: The case of business and environmental interest groups in the European Union. Energy Policy. vol. 36. no. 8. pp. 2964-2972. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.04.016
  207. Hacker, J. S. & Pierson, P. 2014. After the "Master Theory"?: Downs, Schattschneider and the Rebirth of Policy-Focused Analysis. Perspectives. vol. 12. no. 3. pp. 643-662. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/S1537592714001637
  208. Hall, P. A. & Soskice, D. 2001. Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford University Press. Oxford. Open Google Scholar
  209. Halpin, D. 2011. Explaining Policy Bandwagons: Organized Interest Mobilization and Cascades of Attention. Governance-an International Journal of Policy Administration and Institutions. vol. 24. no. 2. pp. 205-230. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2011.01522.x
  210. Halpin, D. R. & Binderkrantz, A. S. 2011. Explaining breadth of policy engagement: patterns of interest group mobilization in public policy. Journal of European Public Policy. vol. 18. no. 2. pp. 201-219. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2011.544499
  211. Han, N. H. 2012. Steel as the backbone of the modern economy. LCA AND STEEL seminar. Worldsteel Association. Bejing. Open Google Scholar
  212. Hassel, A. 2007. Gewerkschaften. In: von Winter, T. & Willems, U. (eds.) Interessenverbände in Deutschland. Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Wiesbaden. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-90602-7_6
  213. Hayek, F. A. 1945. The Use of Knowledge in Society. American Economic Review. vol. 35. no. 4. pp. 519-530. Open Google Scholar
  214. Heal, G. & Dasgupta, P. 1979. Economic Theory of Exhaustible Resources. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge. Open Google Scholar
  215. Heaney, M. T. 2010. Linking Political Parties and Interest Groups. In: Maisel, L. S. & Berry, J. M. (eds.) The Oxford handbook of American political parties and interest groups. Oxford University Press. Oxford. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199542628.001.0001
  216. Heclo, H. 1978. Issue Networks and the Executive Establishment. In: King, A. S. & Beer, S. H. (eds.) The new American political system. American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research. Washington. Open Google Scholar
  217. Heinrich Böll Stiftung. 2010. Die deutsche Rohstoffstrategie- was steht drin und was bedeutet das? [Online]. Heinrich Böll Stiftung. Available: Open Google Scholar
  218. http://www.boell.de/de/internationalepolitik/ressourcenpolitik-oekologie-deutsche-rohstoffstrategie-klartext-10431.html [Accessed 29/09/2014]. Open Google Scholar
  219. Henisz, W. 2013. Political Constraint Index Dataset (POLCON). Available: http://www-management.wharton.upenn.edu/henisz/ [Accessed 01/04/2015]. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1057/9781137294678.0574
  220. Henneberger, F. 2010. Zentrale Theorien und etwas Empirie zur Analyse des kollektiven Handelns von Unternehmern. In: Schroeder, W. & Weßels, B. (eds.) Handbuch Arbeitgeber- und Wirtschaftsverbände in Deutschland ein Handbuch. Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Wiesbaden. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-92452-6_7
  221. Hibbs, D. A. 1977. Political parties and macroeconomic policy. American Political Science Review. vol. 71 (December). pp. 1467-1487. Open Google Scholar
  222. Hillman, A. L. 1989. The political economy of protection. Routledge. London. Open Google Scholar
  223. Hoepner, M. 2007. Ist Politik gegen Verbände möglich? 25 Mancur Olsons "The Rise and Decline of Nations". Leviathan. vol. 35. no. 3. pp. 310-347. Open Google Scholar
  224. Hojnacki, M., Kimball, D. C., Baumgartner, F. R., Berry, J. M. & Leech, B. L. 2012. Studying Organizational Advocacy and Influence: Reexamining Interest Group Research. Annual Review of Political Science. vol. 15. no.1 pp. 379-399. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-070910-104051
  225. Holyoke, T. T. 2003. Choosing Battlegrounds: Interest Group Lobbying across Multiple Venues. Political Research Quarterly. vol. 56. no. 3. pp. 325-336. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/106591290305600307
  226. Holyoke, T. T. 2014. Interest groups and lobbying : pursuing political interests in America. Westview Press. Boulder. Open Google Scholar
  227. Hood, C. 1986. Administrative analysis : an introduction to rules, enforcement, and organizations. Wheatsheaf Books. New York. Open Google Scholar
  228. Hooghe, M. 2012. Die langsame Erosion neokorporatistischer Interssenvermittlung. In: Reutter, W. (ed.) Verbände und Interessengruppen in den Ländern der Europäischen Union. Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Wiesbaden. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-19183-6
  229. Horgos, D. & Zimmermann, K. W. 2009. Interest groups and economic performance: some new evidence. Public Choice. vol. 138. no. 3-4. pp. 301-315. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/s11127-008-9360-4
  230. Hoth, P. 2012. Die Rohstoffpolitik der Bundesregierung. Präsentation für den Rohstofftag Rheinland-Pfalz. Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Energie. Berlin. Open Google Scholar
  231. Houses of Parliament 2011. Postnote: Rare Earth Metals. Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology. London. Open Google Scholar
  232. Howlett, M., Ramesh, M. & Perl, A. 2009. Studying public policy : policy cycles & policy subsystems. Oxford University Press. Oxford. Open Google Scholar
  233. Humphreys, D. 1995. Whatever happened to security of supply? Minerals policy in the post-cold war world. Resources Policy. vol. 21. no. 2. pp. 91-97. Open Google Scholar
  234. Humphreys, D. 2010a. The great metals boom: A retrospective. Resources Policy. vol. 35. no. 1. pp. 1-13. Open Google Scholar
  235. Humphreys, D. 2010b. Minerals: industry history and fault lines of conflict. POLINARES Research Project of the EU. Brussel. Open Google Scholar
  236. IMF. 2014. Government Finance Statistics. IMF. Washington [Accessed 11/11/2014]. Open Google Scholar
  237. International Foundation for Electoral Systems. 2015. Election Guide. International Foundation for Electoral Systems. Available: http://www.electionguide.org/ [Accessed 09.02.2015]. Open Google Scholar
  238. Iversen, T. 2001. The Dynamics of Welfare State Expansion: Trade Openness, De-industrialization and Partisan Politics. In: Pierson, P. (ed.) The new politics of the welfare state. Oxford University Press. Oxford Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/0198297564.003.0003
  239. Jahn, D. 2014. Changing of the guard: trends in corporatist arrangements in 42 highly industrialized societies from 1960 to 2010. Socio-Economic Review. vol. no. pp. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwu028
  240. Jankowski, R. 1989. Preference Aggregation in Firms and Corporatist Organizations - the Enterprise Group as a Cellular Encompassing Organization. American Journal of Political Science. vol. 33. no. 4. pp. 973-996. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/2111117
  241. Japan Oil Gas and Metals National Corporation. 2015. Japan Oil, Gas and Metals National Corporation - Stockpiling [Online]. Available: Open Google Scholar
  242. http://www.jogmec.go.jp/english/stockpiling/index.html [Accessed 07/04/2015]. Open Google Scholar
  243. Jensen, N. M. 2003. Democratic Governance and Multinational Corporations: Political Regimes and Inflows of Foreign Direct Investment. International Organization. vol. 57. no. 2. pp. 587-616. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/S0020818303573040
  244. Jones, B. D. & Baumgartner, F. R. 2005. The politics of attention : how government prioritizes problems. University of Chicago Press. Chicago. Open Google Scholar
  245. Kang, H. G. & Holyoke, T. T. 2013. No Exaggeration: Truthfulness in the Lobbying of Government Agencies by Competing Interest Groups. Japanese Journal of Political Science. vol.14 no.4 pp. 499-520. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/S1468109913000248
  246. Katzenstein, P. J. 1978. Between Power and Plenty: Foreign Economic Policies of Advanced Industrial States. University of Wisconsin Press. Madison. Open Google Scholar
  247. Kiewiet, D. R. 2000. Economic retrospective voting and incentives for policymaking. Electoral Studies. vol. 19. no. 2-3. pp. 427-444. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1016/S0261-3794(99)00060-8
  248. King, G., Keohane, R. O. & Verba, S. 1994. Designing social inquiry scientific inference in qualitative research. Princeton University Press. Princeton. Open Google Scholar
  249. Knoepfel, P., Varone, F., Larue, C. & Veit, S. 2011. Politikanalyse. B. Budrich. Opladen. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1332/policypress/9781861349071.003.0010
  250. Krishna, V. & Morgan, J. 1999. A model of expertise.Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol 116. no.2. pp. 747-775. Open Google Scholar
  251. Laffont, J. J. & Tirole, J. 1991. The Politics of Government Decision-Making - a Theory of Regulatory Capture. Quarterly Journal of Economics. vol. 106. no. 4. pp. 1089-1127. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/2937958
  252. Lagneaux, F. & Vivet, D. 2009. The Belgian Iron and Steel Industry in the International Context. National Bank of Belgium. Brussels. Open Google Scholar
  253. Lake, D. A. 2009. Open economy politics: A critical review. Review of International Organizations. vol. 4. no. 3. pp. 219-244. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/s11558-009-9060-y
  254. Lang, A. & Schneider, V. 2007. Wirtschaftsverbände. Verbandspolitik im Spannungsfeld von divergierenden Interessen und hierarchischer Integration. In: von Winter, T. & Willems, U. (eds.) Interessenverbände in Deutschland. Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Wiesbaden. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-90602-7_8
  255. Leech, B. L. 2010. Lobbying and Influence. In: Maisel, L. S. & Berry, J. M. (eds.) The Oxford handbook of American political parties and interest groups. Oxford University Press. Oxford. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199542628.003.0028
  256. Lehmbruch, G. 1977. Liberal Corporatism and Party Government. Comparative Political Studies. vol. 10. no. 1. pp. 91-126. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/001041407701000105
  257. Lehmbruch, G. 1985. Concertation and the Structure of Corporatist Networks. In: Goldthorpe, J. H. (ed.) Order and conflict in contemporary capitalism. Clarendon Press. Oxford. Open Google Scholar
  258. Leuthard, D. 2008. Ressourcenknappheit. In: Staatssekretariat für Wirtschaft (SECO) (ed.) Die Volkswirtschaft. Staatssekretariat für Wirtschaft (SECO). Bern. Open Google Scholar
  259. Lewis-Beck, M. S. & Paldam, M. 2000. Economic voting: an introduction. Electoral Studies. vol. 19. no. 2-3. pp. 113-121. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1016/S0261-3794(99)00042-6
  260. Lijphart, A. 1971. Comparative Politics and the Comparative Method. The American Political Science Review. vol. 65. no. 3. pp. 682-693. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/1955513
  261. Lijphart, A. 1999. Patterns of democracy government forms and performance in thirty-six countries. Yale University Press. New Haven. Open Google Scholar
  262. Lijphart, A. & Crepaz, M. M. L. 1991. Corporatism and consensus democracy in 18 countries - conceptual and empirical linkages. British Journal of Political Science. vol. 21. no. pp. 235-246. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/S0007123400006128
  263. Lindblom, C. E. 1977. Politics and markets the world's political economic system. Basic Books. New York. Open Google Scholar
  264. Liski, M. & Murto, P. 2006. Backstop Technology Adoption. HECER Discussion Paper [Online], no. 94. Available: Open Google Scholar
  265. http://ethesis.helsinki.fi/julkaisut/eri/hecer/disc/94/backstop.pdf [Accessed 30/01/2010]. Open Google Scholar
  266. Lowery, D. & Gray, V. 1993. The Density of State Interest Group Systems. Journal of Politics. vol. 55. no. 1. pp. 191-206. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/2132236
  267. Lowery, D. & Gray, V. 2004a. Bias in the Heavenly Chorus: Interests in Society and before Government. Journal of Theoretical Politics. vol. 16. no. 1. pp. 5-29. Open Google Scholar
  268. Lowery, D. & Gray, V. 2004b. A neopluralist perspective on research on organized interests. Political Research Quarterly. vol. 57. no. 1. pp. 163-175. Open Google Scholar
  269. Lowery, D. & Gray, V. 2010. The comparative advantage of state interest organization research. In: Maisel, L. S. & Berry, J. M. (eds.) The Oxford handbook of American political parties and interest groups. Oxford University Press. Oxford. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199542628.001.0001
  270. Lowery, D., Gray, V., Anderson, J. & Newmark, A. J. 2004. Collective action and the mobilization of institutions. Journal of Politics. vol. 66. no. 3. pp. 684-705. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2004.00272.x
  271. Lowery, D., Gray, V. & Monogan, J. 2008a. The Construction of Interest Communities: Distinguishing Bottom-Up and Top-Down Models. Journal of Politics. vol. 70. no. 4. pp. 1160-1176. Open Google Scholar
  272. Lowery, D., Poppelaars, C. & Berkhout, J. 2008b. The European Union Interest System in Comparative Perspective: A Bridge Too Far? West European Politics. vol. 31. no. 6. pp. 1231-1252. Open Google Scholar
  273. Lowi, T. J. 1972. Four Systems of Policy, Politics and Choice. Public Administration Review. vol. 32. no. pp. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/974990
  274. LSE GV413 Group. 2012. Groups and the Limited Pluralism of the Set-Piece Consultation. The British Journal of Politics & International Relations. vol. 14. no. 1. pp. 175-186. Open Google Scholar
  275. Lucas, R., Bleischwitz, R., Krause, M. & Stürmer, M. 2008. Kupfereffizienz - unerschlossene Potenziale, neue Perspektiven [Online]. Wuppertal Institute. Available: http://www.wupperinst.org/publikationen/entwd/index.html?beitrag_id=905&bid=161 [Accessed 31/12/2008]. Open Google Scholar
  276. Lucas, S. R. & Szatrowski, A. 2014. Qualitative Comparative Analysis in Critical Perspective. Sociological Methodology. vol. 44. no. 1. pp. 1-79. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/0081175014532763
  277. Lux, S., Crook, T. R. & Woehr, D. J. 2011. Mixing Business With Politics: A Meta-Analysis of the Antecedents and Outcomes of Corporate Political Activity. Journal of Management. vol. 37. no. 1. pp. 223-247. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/0149206310392233
  278. Macher, J. T., Mayo, J. W. & Schiffer, M. 2011. The Influence of Firms on Government. B. E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy. vol. 11. no. 1. pp. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2202/1935-1682.2153
  279. Mahoney, C. & Baumgartner, F. 2008. Converging Perspectives on Interest Group Research in Europe and America. West European Politics. vol. 31. no. 6. pp. 1253-1273. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/01402380802372688
  280. Mahoney, J. 2008. Toward a Unified Theory of Causality. Comparative Political Studies. vol. 41. no. 4-5. pp. 412-436. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/0010414007313115
  281. Mahoney, J. & Goertz, G. 2006. A Tale of Two Cultures: Contrasting Quantitative and Qualitative Research. Political Analysis. vol. 14. no. 3. pp. 227-249. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpj017
  282. Mahoney, J., Kimball, E. & Koivu, K. L. 2009. The Logic of Historical Explanation in the Social Sciences. Comparative Political Studies. vol. 42. no. 1. pp. 114-146. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/0010414008325433
  283. Mahoney, J. & Thelen, K. A. 2010. Explaining institutional change : ambiguity, agency, and power. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge. Open Google Scholar
  284. Maisel, L. S. & Berry, J. M. (eds.) 2010. The Oxford handbook of American political parties and interest groups. Oxford University Press. Oxford. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199542628.001.0001
  285. Mallard, G. 2014. Static Common Agency and Political Influence: an Evaulative Survey. Journal of Economic Surveys. vol. 28. no. 1. pp. 17-35. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6419.2012.00737.x
  286. Marshall, M. G., Gurr, T. R. & Jaggers, K. 2010. Polity IV Project - Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800-2009. Center for Systemic Peace and Center for Global Policy. Washington. Open Google Scholar
  287. Martimort, D. & Semenov, A. 2008. Ideological uncertainty and lobbying competition. Journal of Public Economics. vol. 92. no. 3-4. pp. 456-481. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2007.10.004
  288. Matthews, M. M. 2001. Institutions, Interests, Energy, and the Environment: Policymaking in Corporatism, Pluralism, and Beyond. Policy Studies Journal. vol. 29. no. 3. pp. 407-413. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2001.tb02101.x
  289. McFarland, A. 2010. Interest Group Theory. In: Maisel, L. S. & Berry, J. M. (eds.) The Oxford handbook of American political parties and interest groups. Oxford University Press. Oxford. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199542628.001.0001
  290. McGillivray, F. 2004. Privileging industry : the comparative politics of trade and industrial policy. Princeton University Press. Princeton. Open Google Scholar
  291. McKay, A. & Yackee, S. W. 2007. Interest group competition on federal agency rules. American Politics Research. vol. 35. no. 3. pp. 336-357. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/1532673X06296571
  292. Meadows, D., Meadows, D., Randers, J. & Behrens, W. 1972. Limits to Growth. Chelsea Green Publishing. Vermont. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1349/ddlp.1
  293. Mény, Y., Wright, V. & Rhodes, M. 1987. The Politics of steel : Western Europe and the steel industry in the crisis years (1974-1984). W. de Gruyter. Berlin. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1086/627968
  294. Merton, R. K. 1936. The Unanticipated Consequences of Purposive Social Action. American Sociological Review. vol. 1. no. 6. pp. 894-904. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/2084615
  295. Mill, J. S. 1889. A system of logic ratiocinative and inductive. Longmans. London. Open Google Scholar
  296. Milner, M. & Gow, D. 2006. Arcelor rejects steel industry's biggest merger proposal. The Guardian. 30/01/2006. Open Google Scholar
  297. Ministère de la Région Wallonne 1984. Décret modifiant , ence qui regarde le Conseil Économique Régional pour la Wallonie, la lo cadre du 15 Juillet 1970 portant organisation de la planification et de la décentralisation économique et instaurant un Conseil Économique et Social de la Région Wallonne. Brussels. Open Google Scholar
  298. Ministerie van de Vlaamse Gemeenschap 2003. 18 Juli 2003. - Decreet tot regeling van strategische adviesraden Brussels. Open Google Scholar
  299. Ministerie van de Vlaamse Gemeenschap 2004. 30 April 2004. - Decreet tot aanvulling van het decreet van 5 april 1995 houdende algemene bepalingen inzake milieubeleid met een titel « Strategische adviesraad » en tot wijziging van diverse andere decreten. Brussels. Open Google Scholar
  300. Misereor, Global Policy Forum Europe, Brot für die Welt, Diakonie, FIAN Deutschland, GegenStömung, GermanWatch, INFOE, Internationales Konversionszentrum Bonn, Philippinenbüro, PowerShift, Südwind & Urgewald 2010. Aide Memoire - Rohstoffe für die Reichen. Miseror. Berlin. Open Google Scholar
  301. MMSD 2002. Breaking New Ground - Mining, Minerals and Sustainable development. Earthscan Ltd. London. Open Google Scholar
  302. Mundlak, Y. 1978. Pooling of Time-Series and Cross-Section Data. Econometrica. vol. 46. no. 1. pp. 69-85. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/1913646
  303. Natural Resources Canada. 2010. Canada and the EITI [Online]. Available: http://eiti.nrcan.gc.ca/faq2-eng.php [Accessed 25/11/2014]. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.4095/293369
  304. Nordhaus, W. D. 1975. Political Business Cycle. Review of Economic Studies. vol. 42. no. 2. pp. 169-190. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/2296528
  305. Obinger, H. & Zohlnhöfer, R. 2007. Retreat of the intervention state? The changes in government subsidy expenditure in the OECD since 1980. Swiss Political Science Review. vol. 13. no. 2. pp. 203-236. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1002/j.1662-6370.2007.tb00076.x
  306. OECD 2007. OECD factbook 2007 : economic, environmental and social statistics. OECD. Paris. Open Google Scholar
  307. OECD. 2010a. The Economic Impact of Export Restrictions on Raw Materials. OECD Trade Policy Studies. OECD Publishing. Paris. Open Google Scholar
  308. OECD 2010b. The Iron and Steel Industry in 2009. OECD. Paris. Open Google Scholar
  309. OECD. 2014. STAN Industry 2008. OECD. Paris. Available: Open Google Scholar
  310. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/data-00029-en [Accessed 13/12/2014]. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1787/data-00029-en
  311. OECD. 2015. Members and Partners- OECD [Online]. Available: Open Google Scholar
  312. http://www.oecd.org/about/membersandpartners/ [Accessed 11/04/2015]. Open Google Scholar
  313. Olsen, W. 2014. Comment: The Usefulness of QCA under Realist Assumptions. Sociological Methodology. vol. 44. no. 1. pp. 101-107. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/0081175014542080
  314. Olson, M. 1965. The logic of collective action. Harvard University Press. Cambridge. Open Google Scholar
  315. Olson, M. 1982. The rise and decline of nations : economic growth, stagflation, and social rigidities. Yale University Press. New Haven. Open Google Scholar
  316. Ostrowski, W. 2013. The political economy of global resources. In: Dannreuther, R. & Ostrowski, W. (eds.) Global resources : conflict and cooperation. Palgrave Macmillan. Hampshire. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1057/9781137349149.0013
  317. Parlement Wallon 2010. Question orale de M. Desgain à M. Marcourt, vice-president et ministre de l'économie, des PME, du commerce exterieur et des technologies nouvelles sur "Les risques de pénurie d'apprivoisement pour quatorze matières premières minreales critiques. Parlement Wallon. Namur. Open Google Scholar
  318. Peltzman, S. 1976. Toward a more general theory of regulation. Journal of Law and Economics. vol. 19. no. 2. pp. 211-240. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1086/466865
  319. Persson, T. & Tabellini, G. 2004. Constitutional rules and fiscal policy outcomes. American Economic Review. vol. 94. no. 1. pp. 25-45. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1257/000282804322970689
  320. Peters, B. G. 2006. Consociationalism, corruption and chocolate: Belgian exceptionalism. West European Politics. vol. 29. no. 5. pp. 1079-1092. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/01402380600969008
  321. Pfeffer, J. & Salancik, G. R. 2009. The external control of organizations : a resource dependence perspective. Stanford University Press. Stanford. Open Google Scholar
  322. Price, A. & Scott, N. 2009. Export Barriers and Global Trade in Raw Materials: The Steel Industry Experience. OECD Raw Materials Committee. Paris. Open Google Scholar
  323. Putnam, R. D. 1988. Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games. International Organization. vol. 42. no. 3. pp. 427-460. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300027697
  324. Pyle, W. & Solanko, L. 2013. The composition and interests of Russia's business lobbies: testing Olson's hypothesis of the "encompassing organization". Public Choice. vol. 155. no. 1-2. pp. 19-41. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/s11127-011-9823-x
  325. Radetzki, M. 2006. The anatomy of three commodity booms. Resources Policy. vol. 31. no. 1. pp. 56-64. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2006.06.003
  326. Radetzki, M. 2008. A handbook of primary commodities in the global economy. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511493584.001
  327. Radetzki, M., Eggert, R. G., Lagos, G., Lima, M. & Tilton, J. E. 2008. The boom in mineral markets: How long might it last? Resources Policy. vol. 33. no. 3. pp. 125-128. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2008.05.002
  328. Ragin, C. C. 1987. The comparative method : moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies. University of California Press. Berkeley Open Google Scholar
  329. Ragin, C. C. 1998. The logic of qualitative comparative analysis. International Review of Social History. vol. 43. Supplement. pp. 105-124. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/S0020859000115111
  330. Ragin, C. C. 2000. Fuzzy-set social science. University of Chicago Press. Chicago. Open Google Scholar
  331. Ragin, C. C. 2008. Redesigning social inquiry : fuzzy sets and beyond. University of Chicago Press. Chicago. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226702797.001.0001
  332. Ragin, C. C. & Becker, H. S. 1992. What is a case? : exploring the foundations of social inquiry. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge. Open Google Scholar
  333. Rehder, B. 2009. Interessenvermittlung in Politikfeldern ein vergleichendes Fazit. In: Rehder, B., von Winter, T. & Willems, U. (eds.) Interessenvermittlung in Politikfeldern - vergleichende Befunde der Policy- und Verbändeforschung. Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Wiesbaden. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-91697-2_14
  334. Rehder, B., von Winter, T. & Willems, U. 2009. Interessenvermittlung in Politikfeldern vergleichende Befunde der Policy- und Verbändeforschung. Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Wiesbaden. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-91697-2_1
  335. Reutter, W. 2012. Verbände und Interessengruppen in den Ländern der Europäischen Union. Springer VS. Wiesbaden. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-19183-6
  336. Rhodes, R. A. W. & Marsh, D. 1992. New Directions in the Study of Policy Networks. European Journal of Political Research. vol. 21. no. 1-2. pp. 181-205. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.1992.tb00294.x
  337. Ricardo, D. 1817. On the principles of political economy and taxation. London. Open Google Scholar
  338. Richardson, J. 2000. Government, interest groups and policy change. Political Studies. vol. 48. no. 5. pp. 1006-1025. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.00292
  339. Rickard, S. J. 2012a. A Non-Tariff Protectionist Bias in Majoritarian Politics: Government Subsidies and Electoral Institutions. International Studies Quarterly. vol. 56. no. 4. pp. 777-785. Open Google Scholar
  340. Rickard, S. J. 2012b. Welfare versus Subsidies: Governmental Spending Decisions in an Era of Globalization. The Journal of Politics. vol. 74. no. 4. pp. 1171-1183. Open Google Scholar
  341. Rodrik, D. 1996. Why Do More Open Economies Have Bigger Governments? National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series. Available: http://www.nber.org/papers/w5537 [Accessed 09/04/2015]. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.3386/w5537
  342. Rogowski, R. 1989. Commerc and Coalitions: How trade affects Domestic Political Alignments. In: Frieden, J. A. & Lake, D. A. (eds.) International Political Economy: Perspectives on global power and wealth. Routledge. London. Open Google Scholar
  343. Rohlfing, I. 2012. Case studies and causal inference - an integrative framework. Palgrave Macmillan. New York. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1057/9781137271327_5
  344. Rohstoffallianz AG. 2014. Historie der Rohstoffallianz [Online]. Available: http://www.rohstoffallianz.com/de/rohstoffallianz/organisation/historie/ [Accessed 29/09/2014]. Open Google Scholar
  345. Rotering, J., von Hochberg, P., Naujok, N. & Schmidt-Brockhoff, T. 2012. Die Stahlindustrie in Deutschland "Rückgrat des Industriestandortes Deutschland". Booz&Company. Düsseldorf. Open Google Scholar
  346. Sabatier, P. A. 1988. An Advocacy Coalition Framework of Policy Change and the Role of Policy-Oriented Learning Therein. Policy Sciences. vol. 21. no. 2-3. pp. 129-168. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/BF00136406
  347. Schattschneider, E. E. 1960. The semisovereign people : a realist's view of democracy in America. Holt, Rinehart and Winston. New York. Open Google Scholar
  348. Schlozman, K. L. 1984. What Accent the Heavenly Chorus? Political Equality and the American Pressure System. The Journal of Politics. vol. 46. no. 04. pp. 1006-1032. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/2131240
  349. Schlozman, K. L. 2010. Who sings in the Heavenly Chorus: The shape of the organized interest system. In: Maisel, L. S. & Berry, J. M. (eds.) The Oxford handbook of American political parties and interest groups. Oxford University Press. Oxford. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199542628.001.0001
  350. Schlozman, K. L., Jones, P. E., You, H. Y., Burch, T., Verba, S. & Brady, H. E. 2014. Louder Chorus- Same Accent: The Representation of Interests in Pressure Politics, 1991-2011. Issue in Governance Studies. no. 65 (Jan 2014). Open Google Scholar
  351. Schlozman, K. L., Verba, S. & Brady, H. E. 2012. The unheavenly chorus : unequal political voice and the broken promise of American democracy. Princeton University Press. Princeton. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1515/9781400841912
  352. Schmitter, P. & Streeck, W. 1999. The organization of business interests. Studying the associative action of business in advanced industrial societies. MPIfG Discussion Paper. Max-Planck-Institute für Gesellschaftsforschung. Cologne. Open Google Scholar
  353. Schmitter, P. C. 1974. Still the Century of Corporatism? The Review of Politics. vol. 36. no. 01. pp. 85-131. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/S0034670500022178
  354. Schmitter, P. C. 1977. Corporatism and policy-making in contemporary western Europe. Sage. London. Open Google Scholar
  355. Schmitter, P. C. 1979. Interessenvermittlung und Regierbarkeit. In: von Alemann, U. & Heinze, R. (eds.) Verbände und Staat. Westdeutscher Verlag. Opladen. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-83904-6_3
  356. Schmitter, P. C. 1982. Reflections on Wheter the Theory of Neo-Corporatism Has Gone and Where the Praxis of Neo-Corporatism. Sage. London. Open Google Scholar
  357. Schneider, C. Q. & Rohlfing, I. 2013. Combining QCA and Process Tracing in Set-Theoretic Multi-Method Research. Sociological Methods & Research. vol. 42. no. 4. pp. 559-597. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/0049124113481341
  358. Schneider, C. Q. & Wagemann, C. 2007. Qualitative Comparative Analysis und Fuzzy Sets : ein Lehrbuch für Anwender und jene, die es werden wollen. Budrich. Opladen. Open Google Scholar
  359. Schneider, C. Q. & Wagemann, C. 2010. Standards of Good Practice in Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Fuzzy-Sets. Comparative Sociology. vol. 9. no. 3. pp. 397-418. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1163/156913210X12493538729793
  360. Schroeder, W. & Weßels, B. 2010. Einleitung. In: Schroeder, W. & Weßels, B. (eds.) Handbuch Arbeitgeber- und Wirtschaftsverbände in Deutschland ein Handbuch. Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Wiesbaden. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-92452-6
  361. Schubert, K. & Bandelow, N. C. 2009. Lehrbuch der Politikfeldanalyse 2.0. Oldenbourg. München. Open Google Scholar
  362. Seawright, J. 2014. Comment: Limited Diversity and the Unreliability of QCA. Sociological Methodology. vol. 44. no. 1. pp. 118-121. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/0081175014542082
  363. Sénat de Belgique 2011a. Proposition de résolution visant à développer une stratégie européenne à long terme concernant les terres et les minerais rares. Sénat de Belgique. Brussel. Open Google Scholar
  364. Sénat de Belgique 2011b. Question écrite n. 5-702 de Patrick De Groote (N-VA) au vice-premier ministre et ministre des Affaires étrangères et des Réformes institutionnelles. Sénat de Belgique. Brussels. Open Google Scholar
  365. Service Politique de Produits 2009. Plan fédéral Produits (vole environnement) 2009-2012. Service Politique de Produits. Brussels. Open Google Scholar
  366. Service Publique Fédéral Économie PME Classes Moyennes et Energie 2013. Loi portant insertion du Livre XIII "Concertation" Code de droit économique. Brussels. Open Google Scholar
  367. Siaroff, A. 1999. Corporatism in 24 industrial democracies: Meaning and measurement. European Journal of Political Research. vol. 36. no. 2. pp. 175-205. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.00467
  368. Smith, A. 2002. An inquiry into the nature and causes of The wealth of nations : two volumes in one. University of Chicago Press. Chicago. Open Google Scholar
  369. Smith, M. A. 2010. The Mobilization and Influence of Business. In: Maisel, L. S. & Berry, J. M. (eds.) The Oxford handbook of American political parties and interest groups. Oxford University Press. Oxford. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199542628.003.0023
  370. SOGEPA. 2015. Historique. Société wallonne de Gestion et de Participations. Favre. Available: http://www.sogepa.be/en/our-history [Accessed 25/01/2015]. Open Google Scholar
  371. Speth, R. 2010a. Arbeitgeber- und Wirtschaftsverbände in Politik und Gesellschaft. In: Schroeder, W. & Weßels, B. (eds.) Handbuch Arbeitgeber und Wirtschaftsverbände in Deutschland. VS Verlag. Wiesbaden. Open Google Scholar
  372. Speth, R. 2010b. Grenzen der politischen Kommunikation von Unternehmensverbänden. In: Schroeder, W. & Weßels, B. (eds.) Handbuch Arbeitgeber und Wirtschaftsverbände in Deutschland. VS Verlag. Wiesbaden. Open Google Scholar
  373. Statistisches Bundesamt Wiesbaden 2014. Unternehmen, Tätige Personen, Umsatz, Investitionen,Bruttowertschöpfung: Deutschland, Jahre, Unternehmensgröße,Wirtschaftsbereiche. Statistisches Bundesamt Wiesbaden. Wiesbaden. Open Google Scholar
  374. Stigler, G. J. 1971. The Theory of Economic Regulation. The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science. vol. 2. no. 1. pp. 3-21. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/3003160
  375. Stigler, H. & Felbinger 2008. Der Interviewleitfaden im qualitativen Interview. In: Stigler, H. & Reicher, H. (eds.) Praxisbuch empirische Sozialforschung. StudienVerlag. Wien. Open Google Scholar
  376. Streeck, W. & Thelen, K. A. 2005. Beyond continuity : institutional change in advanced political economies. Oxford University Press. Oxford. Open Google Scholar
  377. Thomas, C. S. (ed.) 1993. First world interest groups : a comparative perspective. Greenwood Press. Westport. Open Google Scholar
  378. Tiess, G. 2009a. Rechtsgrundlagen der Rohstoffpolitik : Ausgewählte Länder Europas. Springer-Verlag. Wien. Open Google Scholar
  379. Tiess, G. 2009b. Rohstoffpolitik in Europa : Bedarf, Ziele, Ansätze. Springer-Verlag. Wien. Open Google Scholar
  380. Tiess, G. 2010. Minerals policy in Europe: Some recent developments. Resources Policy. vol. 35. no. 3. pp. 190-198. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2010.05.005
  381. Transparency International 2005. Transparency International Corruption Percecption Index 2005. Transparency International. Berlin. Open Google Scholar
  382. Traxler, F., Blaschke, S. & Kittel, B. 2001. National labour relations in internationalized markets : a comparative study of institutions, change, and performance. Oxford University Press. Oxford. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198295549.003.0020
  383. Truman, D. 1951. The Governmental Process: Political Interests and Public Opinion. Alfred A. Knopf. New York. Open Google Scholar
  384. UNCTAD. 2015. Free Market Commodity Price Indices. UNCTADStat. Available: http://unctadstat.unctad.org/wds/TableViewer/tableView.aspx?ReportId=30728 [Accessed 30/03/2015]. Open Google Scholar
  385. United States Geological Survey. 2008. Iron Ore in 2008. USGS Minerals Information. USGS. Available: http://minerals.usgs.gov/minerals/pubs/commodity/iron_ore/mcs-2008-feore.pdf [Accessed 03/04/2015]. Open Google Scholar
  386. UWE 2004. Pour une politique wallonne en faveur de l'industrie. Union Wallonne des Entreprises. Favre. Open Google Scholar
  387. UWE. 2015. Le réseau professionnel le plus influent en Wallonie. Union Wallonne des Entreprises. Wavre. Available: http://www.uwe.be/uwe/uwe-1 [Accessed 24/01/2015]. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1037/t40769-000
  388. Välilä, T. 2006. No policy is an island - on the interaction between industrial and other policies. EIB Papers. vol. 11. no. 2. pp. 8-33. Open Google Scholar
  389. Van de Velde, H. & Mareel, M. 2007. Task Force Mineral Resources in Central Africa (MIRECA). SPF Affaires étrangères Commerce extérieur et Coopération au Développement. Brussels. Open Google Scholar
  390. van der Ploeg, F. 2011. Fiscal Policy and Dutch Disease. International Economics and Economic Policy. vol. 8. no. 2. pp. 121-138. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/s10368-011-0191-2
  391. Van Waarden, F. 1992. Dimensions and Types of Policy Networks. European Journal of Political Research. vol. 21. no. 1-2. pp. 29-52. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.1992.tb00287.x
  392. Visser, J. 2011. ICTWSS: Database on Institutional Characteristics of Trade Unions, Wage Setting, State Intervention and Social Pacts in 34 countries between 1960 and 2007. Amsterdam. Available: http://www.uva-aias.net/208 [Accessed 02/04/2015]. Open Google Scholar
  393. Vlaams Parlement 2011. Voorstel van resolutie van de heren Hermes Sanctorum en Filip Watteeuw betreffende een doeltreffende gronstoffenstrategie voor Vlaanderen. Vlaams Parlement. Brussel. Open Google Scholar
  394. Vlaamse Overheid 2011. Milieubeleidsplan 2011-2015. Vlaamse Overheid. Brussels. Open Google Scholar
  395. Vlaamse Regering. 2004. Decreet inzake de Sociaal-Economische Raad van Vlaanderen. Vlaamse Regering. Brussels. Available: Open Google Scholar
  396. http://codex.vlaanderen.be/Portals/Codex/documenten/1013345.html [Accessed 24/01/2015]. Open Google Scholar
  397. Vlaamse Regering 2011. De Vlaamse Regering 2009-2014. Vlaamse Regering. Brussels. Open Google Scholar
  398. Voelzkow, H. 2007. Die Institutionalisierung der Politikbeteiligung von Verbänden in Deutschland. In: von Winter, T. & Willems, U. (eds.) Interessenverbände in Deutschland. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Wiesbaden. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-90602-7_5
  399. VOKA 2015. Welkom bij Voka, het Vlaams netwerk van ondernemingen. Vlaams network van ondernemingen. Brussels. Open Google Scholar
  400. von Winter, T. & Willems, U. 2007. Interessenverbände als intermediäre Organisationen. In: von Winter, T. & Willems, U. (eds.) Interessenverbände in Deutschland. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Wiesbaden. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-90602-7_1
  401. Wagner, M. & Huy, D. 2005. Commodity Top News. Schafft der Strukturwandel in der Nachfrage eine neue Dimension für die Weltrohstoffmärkte. Bundesanstalt für Geowissenschaften und Rohstoffe. Hannover. vol. 24. Open Google Scholar
  402. Walter, S. 2013. Financial crises and the politics of macroeconomic adjustments. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge. Open Google Scholar
  403. Wasmeier, C. 2009. Erfolgskriterien föderaler Transition: eine vergleichende akteursbasierte Prozessanalyse anhand Spaniens, Belgiens und Russlands. Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Wiesbaden. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-91612-5_6
  404. Wassener, B. 2009. Australia Blocks China´s Purchase of Mining Company. New York Times 29/03/2009. Open Google Scholar
  405. Werland, S. 2012. PolRess Arbeitspapier AS 5.1- Debattenanalyse Rohstoffknappheit. FU Berlin. Berlin. Open Google Scholar
  406. Weßels, B. 2007. Das bundesdeutsche Verbandssystem in vergleichender Perspektive. In: von Winter, T. & Willems, U. (eds.) Interessenverbände in Deutschland. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Wiesbaden. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-90602-7_3
  407. Wiarda, H. J. 1997. Corporatism and comparative politics : the other great "ism". Sharpe. New York. Open Google Scholar
  408. Wilson, J. Q. (ed.) 1980. The Politics of Regulation. Basic Books. New York. Open Google Scholar
  409. Wilson, J. Q. 1995. Political organizations. Princeton University Press. Princeton. Open Google Scholar
  410. Wintermann, J. 2003. Mangelware Nickel. Die WELT. 12/11/2003. Open Google Scholar
  411. Woldendorp, J. & Keman, H. 2010. Dynamic institutional analysis: measuring corporatist intermediation. Quality & Quantity. vol. 44. no. 2. pp. 259-275. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/s11135-008-9195-6
  412. World Bank. 2014. World Development Indicators Online (WDI) [Online]. Available: www.data.worldbank.org [Accessed 19/11/2014]. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0163-1_ch1
  413. World Economic Forum 2010. Global Competitiveness Report. World Economic Forum. Davos. Open Google Scholar
  414. World Guide to Trade Associations 2002. World Guide to Trade Associations. K.G.Saur. München. Open Google Scholar
  415. WTO. 2015. Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization [Online]. Available: https://www.wto.org/english/docs_e/legal_e/04-wto_e.htm [Accessed 07/08/2014]. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1787/data-00648-en
  416. Yackee, J. W. & Yackee, S. W. 2006. A Bias Towards Business? Assessing Interest Group Influence on the U.S. Bureaucracy. The Journal of Politics. vol. 68. no. 1. pp. 128-139. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00375.x
  417. Yin, R. K. 2003. Case study research : design and methods. Sage. Thousand Oaks, Calif. [u.a.]. Open Google Scholar
  418. Zahariadis, N. 2008. State subsidies in the global economy. Palgrave Macmillan. New York. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1057/9780230610514_8
  419. Zahariadis, N. 2010. Discretion by the rules: European state aid policy and the 1999 Procedural Regulation. Journal of European Public Policy. vol. 17. no. 7. pp. 954-970. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2010.499224
  420. Zrihen, O. & Laaouej, A. 2012. Proposition de résolution visant à imposer aux entreprises de production d'électronique, de téléphone mobile et autres technologies de l'information et de communication distribuant sur le territoire belge à faire oeuvre de plus de transparence dans leur politique d'apprivoisement en minerais et matéraux nécessaires à leurs productions. Sénat de Belgique. Brussels. Open Google Scholar

Similar publications

from the topics "Comparative Political Research & Country Studies", "Economics", "Competition Policy & Economic Order Policy & Economic Policy"
Cover of book: Die politische Rechte in Lateinamerika
Edited Book Full access
Nadja Ahmad, Hans-Jürgen Burchardt, Kristina Dietz, Hannes Warnecke-Berger, Jonas Wolff
Die politische Rechte in Lateinamerika
Cover of book: Kapital als Medium
Book Titles No access
Michael Mayer
Kapital als Medium
Cover of book: Zwischen Heimatschutz und Klimaleugnung
Book Titles No access
Marius Fröhle
Zwischen Heimatschutz und Klimaleugnung
Cover of book: Kirche und Demokratie
Book Titles No access
Deborah Geiger
Kirche und Demokratie